Policy: Policy Action Plan
Seinajoki Resources & Context
Stakeholder name Indicate the stakeholder name here. This refers to the organization, not the contact persons for the organization. |
Availability Availability of stakeholders in time they are able and willing to attribute to the policy lab. This is an approximation. |
Expertise/skills The expertise and/or skills held by the stakeholder related to the CRFS. Emphasize how it contributes to the pilot. |
Link to CRFS theme Indicate to which CRFS theme the stakeholder relates. Indicate the themes only and do not provide an explanation or descriptive text. Multiple themes may be included if a stakeholder works across several themes. The themes can be indicated as production, processing, distribution, market, consumption, waste, security, ecosystem, livelihood, inclusion. |
1 Common: |
The Healthy Kids of Seinäjoki steering group |
In the streering group meetings (~4 times/year) |
Professionals related to children nutrition and well-being with different expertice from different organisations. |
Consumption, waste, security, ecosystem,livelihood, inclusion. |
2 The Healthy Snacks: |
1. SJK juniors (Soccer) board / director 2. Seinäjoki sport clubs 3. Local food businesses |
1. Continuoustly 2. Rarely 3. If necessary |
1. Owners of the canteens, trainers/educators of sports and healthy life. Big and known sport club, which is followed by smaller actors. 2. Possibility to make a strategy for the individual teams’s kiosks. |
1. Food consumption, ecosystem, livelihood, inclusion, |
3 The Food Business Club: |
1. Seinäjoki Lyceum 2. Seinäjoki 4h Organization 3. Health inspectors 4. Local food companies |
1. Continuosly
2. Rarely |
1. Home economics teachers, head of catering,
Principal, parent ́s council, student union |
1. Food education, food consumption,
processing, food waste prevention |
4 School Restaurants |
1. Well-being theme group from Seinäjoki schools 2. Architectural Offices |
1. Continously 2. If necessary |
1. Teachers from different Schools in Seinäjoki 2. Designers of school canteens |
1.Food education and the influence of the environment of food, inclusion 2. consumption, security, inclusion |
5 Pikkuprovinssi culture/food festival: |
1. Pikkuprovinssi organisation 2. National Food education association “Ruokakasvatusyhdis tys ruukku ry” 3. The City of Seinäjoki’s Food and Cleaning services 4. Local entrepreneurs’ assosiation “Seinäjoen yrittäjät” |
1. Continuously 3. If necessary 4. If necessary |
1. Production of the festival 2. The best food ecucator network in Finland can provide methods and councelling. 3. The target group and the theme is the same. The happening offers a new platform for the city to show how they do their work with kids. 4. The happening offers a new platform to sell food products, show their responsibility work related to kids. |
1. Food education, Nutrition, inclusion 2. Food education, Consumption, waste, inclusion, responsibility 3. Production, processing, distribution, market, inclusion, responsibility |
Seinajoki Vision
Policy landscape
Aim: Identify policy gap
CRFS policy Create a list of policies that relate to CRFS. This overview is divided into policy areas production / processing / distribution / market / consumption / waste / security / ecosystem / livelihood / inclusion |
Description Describe the policy: its approach and main goals. Please keep this succinct as this section aims to merely set out the elements contained within the policy landscape. Generally you can stop drawing the policy landscape after this point as policy gaps are evident. |
Production
The rural development strategy |
Its main goal is to develop the rural areas of the South Ostrobothia. The Food Province matters is the first priority. |
Processing |
The Climate Road Map for the food sector in South Ostrobothina |
The road map identifies the main development areas, which have an effect to the climate change, of the food chain in the province. |
The Low Carbon Road Map for the Food Processing industry |
The road map maps and suggests actions to reduce the food processing industry’s carbon foot print. |
Consumption |
Local food strategy of Finland. |
The strategy is improving the local food consuming in order to raise the usage of it in the entire food system and develop the local food culture. |
Waste |
The climate roadmap for the South Ostrobothinan food system |
Ecosystem |
Regional Strategy of South Ostrobothnia |
The regional strategy is an expression of the province's will to develop, which defines the province's desired future vision until the year 2050 (=provincial plan). It also includes the province's development goals and measures for the years 2022– 2025 (=provincial program). |
Seinäjoki innovation ecosystem agreement |
Innovation ecosystem agreements are part of the government’s efforts to strengthen globally competitive ecosystems in Finland. The main idea of the agreements is innovative and pioneering cities, which, based on their own strengths, take advantage of the opportunities offered by digitalisation, new technologies and carbon neutrality, thus accelerating economic renewal and a sustainable city. |
South Ostrobothnia Smart Specialization Strategy |
The objectives of smart specialisation are: 1. Strengthening innovation ecosystems 2. International networking 3. Climate- and experience economy |
Livelihood |
Seinäjoki city’s strategy 2018-2025 The Food Province strategy 2030 (in process) |
The strategy development the sectors that the city is responsible of. Food is a small part of it. |
Seinäjoki Wellness Plan 2021-2025 |
The plan has three major goals: opportunity for everyone to participate; well-being, health and safety-promoting activities and services; and good everyday environments |
Inclusion |
The Hobby Model of Finland –steering group |
The Ministry of Culture’s model to organize a hobby for all Finnish children. |
Other |
South Ostrobothnia of hospitality – strategy for tourism |
Identify the policy gap Based on the overview above, assess if a policy gap exists. Identify where the policy gap is located; the policy area or policy (instrument) type. |
In general, the city region food systems are not recognized as their own food systems. |
CRFS landscape
Aim: create a snapshot of the CRFS characteristics
Key characteristic of the CRFS | Description |
Food production | |
Very strong in the city region and also in the whole province. | |
Food processing/distribution | |
Big scale food processing industries are located in the CRFS area. It is based on the good and vast farming areas. | |
Food marketing, catering, retail | |
The food retail is very concentrated in the entire Finland, no exception in Seinäjoki CRFS. There are problems to be able to sell small producers’ products since the lack of good and effective retail possibilities to small scale. |
|
Food consumption | |
The people in the region has more obesity problems than an average Finn. Eating out culture exist but is it not strong. |
|
Food waste | |
There are several food waste projects done in the region. New methods are slowly taken in use, but the issue has gotten attention. |
|
Food security | |
Food security is one of the best in the world in entire Finland, including Seinäjoki CRFS. The possibilities according to the food security knowledge export etc. is not fully used. |
|
Ecosystems | |
The ecosystems’ biodiversity is getting worse. There are some protection work done but it is not done on a regular basis. |
|
Livelihood | |
The food chain is the most important area of income in the Seinäjoki CRFS. So it is essential as well. | |
Inclusion | |
There are some possibilities as a citicen to be part of the food system as an individual. There are food based courses and food fairs. There would be room for more inclusion. |
Strategy development
Aim: define a lab narrative
CRFS status quo |
Seinäjoki CRFS is a very big scale and active CRFS. Agriculture and the biggest companies pay a lot of attention to responsibility and sustainibility. |
CRFS goals |
Seinäjoki CRFS should identify itself as an entity in order to be able to development the theme as a whole. There are acts that need to be done in the
|
CRFS strategy |
There will be a new Food Province Strategy in few months. Seinäjoki is the central city of the Food Province of Finland. In the strategy the city of Seinäjoki is a leading city to take in consideration the food systems since it has the biggest food factories in its area. |
Vision definition
Aim: Translate the CRFS strategy and context assessment into a pilot vision
Describe the CRFS context |
The Seinäjoki City Region Food System is part of the Finnish food system, which main characteristic is that it has a few large national actors in it and several local micro size actors. Seinäjoki is the capital of The Food Province of Finland. In the Province there are big scale food production and food processing industry supported by education, research and restaurant scene. The biggest actors are the front-line actors of responsibility work in the food scene. The smaller companies are more heterogeneous in their sustainability work. The City of Seinäjoki itself produces food services to schools and other units, it can make decisions etc. About land use related to food, and the City makes its own plans and influence other planning processes in the region. |
Formulate the CRFS vision |
The City of Seinäjoki acts in resilient and sustainable ways in all actions it takes according to its own food services and in other own food matters. The city takes a strong role in food related matters that has an influence on children nutrition. |
Seinajoki Pathway to Action
SWOT
Aim: Execute the SWOT analysis
Strength |
|
Weaknesses |
|
Opportunities |
|
Threats |
|
SMART
Aim: Define SMART pilot goals
S M A R T |
Goal 1: |
S) MUFPP application is done by the City of Seinäjoki by 06/2024. M) On/off A) There is a preliminary decision to make the application when applied to be a partner in Cities 2030 consortium. R) Status of MUFPP city. T) Year 2023. The process needs to be done with several inner partners and put through the decision making system of the City of Seinäjoki Themes: Ecosystem, Livelihood, Inclusion |
Goal 2: Promote and boost sport clubs’ role to support children’s healthy food choices, develop their know-how on healthy snacks, and their active role in the food ecosystem and its sustainability transformation |
S) 1) Strengthening cooperation between sport clubs’ and the City of Seinäjoki / Healthy Kids of Seinäjoki and the exchange of information related to |
Goal 3: The Finnish Hobby model has changed so that clubs, which encourage youngsters to build up their own hobby businesses, have more budgeted money to pay for more hours of club leader’s work. |
S) Tarket to diversify Finnish Hoppy model selection, activate and involves pupils M) Commitment of the organizers that wider selection of hobby will stay on schools A) A proper set of permanent partners need to be found to support the hobby in the future R) Status of versatile city for hobby selection in areas schools T) Year 2023, and beginning of 2024 Theme: Consumption, livelihood, ecosystem, waste, inclusion |
Goal 4: To apply school restaurant tuning model in Seinäjoki shcool teaching plans for all schools. |
S) To ensure better status of improving school restaurants, involvenet of students, taking their opinions into account M) Commitment of the board of education realizing the importance of cozyness and spended time, pupils stay longer in restaurant and eat properly if comfort will increase A) Time spent in the restaurant will be longer if time tables and study plans were changed R) A balanced nutrition and learning results during whole school day T) Participation in the working group end of 2022, year 2023 Theme: processing, ecosystem, inclusion |
Goal 5: |
S) Create a food education model for kid or food themed festivals
M) Template done, yes/no. |
Seinajoki Action Plan
Execution plan
Aim: set out the execution of each task
SMART goal 1: MUFPP application is done by the City of Seinäjoki by 12/2023. |
SMART task | Responsibility | Timeframe | Prioritization |
Seek alignment of policies, programmes and projects that impact the food system across multiple sectors and administrative levels |
P12 INTO | 1-2/2023 | 1 |
Interviewing the city of Seinäjoki head of sectors to map and analyze the current stake of sustainable food policies and actions |
P12 INTO | 3-4/2023 | 2 |
Enhance stakeholder participation at the city level through political dialogue, as well as through education and awareness raising |
P12 INTO | 5-10/2023 | 3 |
Developing indicator selection criteria, final selection of indicators and signing the MUFPP |
P12 INTO |
11/2023 - 6/2024 |
4 |
SMART goal 2: Promote and boost sport clubs’ role to support children’s healthy food choices, develop their know-how on healthy snacks, and their active role in the food ecosystem and its sustainability transformation |
SMART task | Responsibility | Timeframe | Prioritization |
Creation of the Healthy Snack concept |
P12 INTO | 11-12/2022 | 1 |
Contacting, promoting, and negotiating together with region’s sports clubs |
P12 INTO | 01-08/2023 | 2 |
Cooperation with the Healthy Kids of Seinäjoki coordinator and the coordination team, present the policy goal and promote the policy |
P12 INTO |
12/2022 - 06/2023 |
3 |
Contact the Finnish Institute of Health and Welfare to ask for cooperation and disseminate the policy through the organization |
P12 INTO | 05-10/2023 | 4 |
SMART goal 3: The Finnish Hobby model has changed so that clubs, which engourage youngsters to build up their own hobby businesses, have more budgeted money to pay for more hours of club leader’s work. |
SMART task | Responsibility | Timeframe | Prioritization |
Contacting the school master and to the authorities |
P13Agria | 2021-2022 | 1 |
To produce content and present the policy goal |
P13Agria | 2022 | 2 |
Pupils and staffs involving | P13Agria | 11,12/2022 | 3 |
Start a group Pilot group meets Results and experiences, staring new group |
P13Agria |
1/2023 |
4 |
SMART goal 4: To apply school restaurant tuning model in Seinäjoki school teaching plans for all schools. |
SMART task | Responsibility | Timeframe | Prioritization |
Participation in the working group, Present the policy goal |
P13Agria | 2022,2023 | 1 |
Involving schoolchildren in Development work Development work |
P13Agria |
11-12/2022 2023 |
2 |
Improvements due the development work |
P13Agria | 2023-2024 | 3 |
Assesments and follow-up | P13Agria | 2024 | 4 |
SMART goal 5: Create a food education model for kid or food themed festivals |
SMART task | Responsibility | Timeframe | Prioritization |
Contacting the festival leader about the idea |
P13Agria | 2/2022 | 1 |
Innovation process with the Pikkuprovinssi festival organization and partners |
P13Agria |
3/2022- 3/2023 |
2 |
Physical arrangements for the pilot experience |
P13Agria | 4-5/2023 | 3 |
Piloting the food education package in the Pikkuprovinssi festival. Data collection. |
P13Agria | 5/2023 | 4 |
Feedback and afterwork of the festival. Making sure the permanent elements of future co-operation are set. |
P13Agria | 5-6/2023 | 5 |
Analysing and reporting of the pilot action and scaling it up to general level. |
P13Agria | 6/2023 | 6 |
Writing a template model of kids’ food education festivals. Spreading the good practise. |
P13Agria | 7-12/2023 | 7 |